Germline pathogenic variants associated with triple-negative breast cancer in US Hispanic and Guatemalan women using hospital and community-based recruitment strategies.

PURPOSE: Recruit and sequence breast cancer subjects in Guatemalan and US Hispanic populations. Identify optimum strategies to recruit Latin American and Hispanic women into genetic studies of breast cancer. METHODS: We used targeted gene sequencing to identify pathogenic variants in 19 familial breast cancer susceptibility genes in DNA from unselected Hispanic breast cancer cases in the US and Guatemala. Recruitment across the US was achieved through community-based strategies. In addition, we obtained patients receiving cancer treatment at major hospitals in Texas and Guatemala. RESULTS: We recruited 287 Hispanic US women, 38 (13%) from community-based and 249 (87%) from hospital-based strategies. In addition, we ascertained 801 Guatemalan women using hospital-based recruitment. In our experience, a hospital-based approach was more efficient than community-based recruitment. In this study, we sequenced 103 US and 137 Guatemalan women and found 11 and 10 pathogenic variants, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes were BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and ATM. In addition, an analysis of 287 US Hispanic patients with pathology reports showed a significantly higher percentage of triple-negative disease in patients with pathogenic variants (41% vs. 15%). Finally, an analysis of mammography usage in 801 Guatemalan patients found reduced screening in women with a lower socioeconomic status (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Guatemalan and US Hispanic women have rates of hereditary breast cancer pathogenic variants similar to other populations and are more likely to have early age at diagnosis, a family history, and a more aggressive disease. Patient recruitment was higher using hospital-based versus community enrollment. This data supports genetic testing in breast cancer patients to reduce breast cancer mortality in Hispanic women.

"You matter": patients perceptions and disparities about cancer care and telehealth during and after COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Disparities in cancer care have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study is to establish how telehealth mitigated the effect of COVID-19 on the healthcare sector and to identify potential disparities in perception and experience with telehealth in cancer care during and after the pandemic. METHODS: We identified individuals with an established cancer diagnosis who received treatment at a comprehensive academic cancer center with a diverse patient population between 2019 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were asked to complete a self-administrated survey intended to collect patient-reported outcomes on socioeconomic and mental health challenges incurred during the pandemic as well as participants' experience with telehealth. The assessment was adapted from a 21-question-based survey applied for mental health. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and the response to the survey items. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess and analyze the contributing factors to the survey responses. RESULTS: A total of N = 136 participants were included in this analysis. The majority of participants (60.6%) reported increased anxiety, stress, or experience of distress as a direct result of COVID-19. However, among 54.1% of survey responders participated in a telehealth appointment and 84.4% agreed it was an easy and effective experience. CONCLUSION: Elderly, male, and black participants reported the worst impact related to the pandemic. The majority of patients had a positive experience with telehealth. The results of the study suggest that telehealth services can serve as a tool for patients with cancer during and beyond active treatment to access supportive services.

Geographic Origin may Affect Outcomes for Hispanic Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health thoroughly explored in the literature include insurance status, race, and ethnicity. There are over 50 million self-identifying Hispanics in the United States. This, however, represents a heterogeneous population. We used a national registry to investigate for significant differences in outcomes of Hispanic patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Unites states, by geographic region of origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of Hispanic patients in the Unites states with NSCLC for which region of origin was documented within the 2004 to 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) registry. This included patients from Cuba, Puerto Rico, Mexico, South and Central America, and the Dominican Republic. We performed multivariate logistic regression modeling to determine whether origin was a significant predictor of cancer staging at diagnosis, adjusting for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status, and facility type. Race was not included due to a nonsignificant association with stage at diagnosis at the bivariate level in this cohort. Subsequently, we used Kaplan-Meier modeling to identify whether overall survival (OS) of Hispanic patients differed by origin. RESULTS: A total of 12,557 Hispanic patients with NSCLC were included in this analysis. The breakdown by origin was as follows: n = 2071 (16.5%) Cuban, n = 2360 (18.8%) Puerto Rican, n = 4950 (39.4%) Mexican, n = 2329 (18.5%) from South or Central America, and n = 847 (6.7%) from the Dominican Republic. After controlling for age, sex, histology, grade, insurance status and treating facility type, we found that geographic origin was a significant predictor of advanced stage at diagnosis (P = .015). Compared to Cubans, patients of Puerto Rican origin were less likely to present with advanced disease (68.4% vs. 71.9%; OR: 0.82; 95%CI: 0.69-0.98; P = .026). We also identified a significant (log-rank P-value<.001) difference in OS by geographic origin, even at early-stages of diagnosis. Dominican patients with NSCLC exhibited the highest 5-year OS rate (63.3%), followed by patients from South/Central America (59.7%), Puerto Rico (52.3%), Mexico (45.9%), and Cuba (43.8%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that for Hispanic individuals living in the Unites states, region/country of origin is significantly associated with outcomes, even after accounting for other known determinants of health. We suggest that region of origin should be studied further as a potential determinant of outcomes in patients with cancer.

Image analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocytes measurement predicts breast cancer pathologic complete response in SWOG S0800 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial.

We assessed the predictive value of an image analysis-based tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) score for pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival in breast cancer (BC). About 113 pretreatment samples were analyzed from patients with stage IIB-IIIC HER-2-negative BC randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. TILs quantification was performed on full sections using QuPath open-source software with a convolutional neural network cell classifier (CNN11). We used easTILs% as a digital metric of TILs score defined as [sum of lymphocytes area (mm2)/stromal area(mm2)] × 100. Pathologist-read stromal TILs score (sTILs%) was determined following published guidelines. Mean pretreatment easTILs% was significantly higher in cases with pCR compared to residual disease (median 36.1 vs.14.8%, p < 0.001). We observed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.606, p < 0.0001) between easTILs% and sTILs%. The area under the prediction curve (AUC) was higher for easTILs% than sTILs%, 0.709 and 0.627, respectively. Image analysis-based TILs quantification is predictive of pCR in BC and had better response discrimination than pathologist-read sTILs%.

ASCO Policy Statement on Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products in Oncology.

As the voice of cancer care clinicians and the patients they serve, ASCO has taken steps to elevate awareness about biosimilar products and their use in oncology. In 2018, ASCO released its Statement on Biosimilars in Oncology which was subsequently published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology to serve as an educational tool which highlighted and provided guidance on several topical areas surrounding biosimilars. At the time of its publication, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved eight biosimilar products for use in the United States, including one product for use as a supportive care agent in the cancer setting and two products for use in the treatment for cancer. This number has risen dramatically (40 approvals), with a total of 22 cancer or cancer-related biosimilar products approved since 2015. Recently, the FDA also approved the four interchangeable biosimilar products for diabetes, certain inflammatory diseases, and certain ophthalmic diseases. Given the current market dynamics and the regulatory landscape, this ASCO manuscript now seeks to propose several policy recommendations across the scope of value, interchangeability, clinician barriers, and patient education and access. This policy statement is intended to guide ASCO's future activities and strategies and serves to affirm our commitment to providing education to the oncology community on the use of biosimilars in the cancer setting.

Thymoma and Myasthenia Gravis: An Examination of a Paraneoplastic Manifestation.

Thymoma is a rare type of malignancy but is considered one of the most common neoplasms that occur in the anterior mediastinum. A large proportion of thymomas are associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, such as myasthenia gravis. Whenever feasible, the standard of care for the treatment of thymoma should focus on the control of paraneoplastic syndromes, surgical resection, and adjuvant therapy if appropriate. A 36-year-old female patient with a significant past medical history of obesity and iron deficiency anemia who underwenten bloc resection of thymoma three months prior now presented to the benign hematology clinic to establish care for the management of anemia. Upon review of systems, the patient incidentally reported fatigue, weakness with repetitive motion, occasional blurred vision, headaches, and exertional dyspnea. Physical examination was positive for horizontal nystagmus. Given the patient's history and clinical findings, suspicion of myasthenia gravis was high. Further work-up demonstrated anti-acetylcholine receptor titers of 5.70 nmol/L (normal < 0.21 nmol/L), supporting a diagnosis of myasthenia gravis in this patient. She was subsequently started on pyridostigmine. Often, patients with thymoma experience paraneoplastic syndrome-related symptoms prior to thymectomy, and in many cases thymectomy is curative. However, in the case presented, we examine a patient that was asymptomatic prior to surgery and subsequently reported the onset of symptoms following what we suspect was an exacerbation due to general anesthesia and pain control medications. We argue that all patients with thymoma should undergo systematic evaluation and treatment of paraneoplastic syndromes, regardless of clinical symptoms and prior to surgery, in order to improve patient quality of life and hospital outcomes.

Factors Associated with the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

(1) Background: Disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes have long been well-documented in the medical literature. With the eruption of advances in new treatment modalities, the long-existing disparities are now being further uncovered and brought to the attention of the medical community. While social health determinants have previously been linked to treatment disparities in lung cancer, we analyzed data from the National Cancer Database to explore sociodemographic and geographic factors related to accepting or declining physician-recommended chemotherapy. Patients diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer between 2004 and 2016 who declined chemotherapy recommended by their physicians were included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Cox Regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to look for survival characteristics. (2) Results: 316,826 patients with Stage IV lung cancer were identified. Factors related to a higher rate of refusal by patients included older age > 70, female sex, low income, lack of insurance coverage, residency in the New England region, and higher comorbidity. Patients living in areas with lower education were less likely to decline chemotherapy. (3) Conclusion: Further understanding of the factors impacting treatment decisions would be essential to improve the efficacy of care delivery in patients with cancer and reduce reversible causes of disparity.

Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer-Related Care in the United States: An Overview.

COVID-19 impacted several health services, including cancer-related care. Its implications were significant due to the lapse in hospital resources, compounded by the delays stemming from the economic effects on patients' jobs and medical coverage. Furthermore, reports suggesting an increased risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer and those on active cancer treatment caused additional fear and potential delays in seeking medical services. This review provides an overview of the pandemic's impact on cancer care in the United States and suggests measures for tackling similar situations in the future.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2-Invasive lobular breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer (ILC) harbors unique clinicopathologic features. Data on optimal treatment modalities focusing on ILC remain scarce. We aim to investigate the benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) ILC. METHODS: Female patients with early HR+/HER2- ILC (stages I-III) who underwent surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) and grouped into four treatment cohorts: surgery only(S), chemotherapy alone (CT), endocrine therapy alone (ET), and combined chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CET). Descriptive and bi-variate statistics summarized baseline characteristics and compared them across cohorts. A secondary analysis accounting for OncotypeDX (ODX) information was performed, stratifying for low (<26) and high (≥26) ODX. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the relationship between treatment modality and overall survival (OS), stratifying for ODX scoring. RESULTS: N = 15,271 patients were included. The CET cohort (29.8%) was more likely to be younger and have no co-morbidities, advanced tumor stage or high ODX score (≥26). No significant difference in OS comparing ET to CET (HR:1.08, 95%CI:0.93-1.26, p = 0.31) was observed, adjusting for confounders. N = 5,561 patients had ODX results available. No significant difference in 5-year OS was observed comparing the ET to CET cohorts, both in patients an ODX score <26 (HR:1.10; 95%CI:0.69-1.76, p = 0.69) and ODX score ≥26 (HR:1.18; 95%CI:0.51-2.75, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy demonstrated no added survival benefit in HR+/HER2- ILC, even in tumors with ODX ≥26. Prospective trials identifying potential subgroups of patients with ILC who could benefit from chemotherapy are needed.

Medullary carcinoma of the colon: A comprehensive analysis of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: Medullary carcinomas (MC) of the colon are uncommon tumors. In this study, we analyzed demographic and disease characteristics as well as survival outcomes of MC versus undifferentiated (UDA) and poorly differentiated (PDA) adenocarcinomas (AC) of the colon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2018) was utilized to identify patients with colon cancer. Patient demographics (including age, gender, race), disease characteristics (including grade, TNM stage, carcinoembryonic levels, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, lymph node status, microsatellite stability, KRAS mutation, and primary tumor site), and facility type and location were evaluated. Chi-square tests were used to compare descriptive data. Cox Regression and Kaplan Meier analyses were used to analyze survival characteristics. RESULTS: 1,041,753 patients with colon cancer were identified of whom 2709 patients had MC and 897,902 had AC (136,597 PDA and 18,042 UDA). MC was seen in older patients (mean age 74 ± 13 years) and women (72.5% vs. 27.5% males). Most MCs were poorly differentiated (63.3%), and 82.4% of patients with MC had microsatellite instability. Fewer patients with MC had perineural invasion (15.6% vs. 22.0% in PDA and 22.4% in UDA, p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (38.4% versus 59.9% with PDA and 59.7% with UDA, p < 0.0001). MC diagnosis increased by year (Cochran-Armitage trend test, p < 0.0001). Kaplan Meir analysis revealed a better prognosis for patients with MC when compared to PDA or UDA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Given the rarity, pathologists should maintain a high suspicion for MC when encountering poorly differentiated or undifferentiated right-sided colon cancer with associated MSI-H.

Merkel cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, disease presentation, and current clinical practice outcomes.

Using the National Cancer Database, we introduce the findings of a retrospective investigation of the largest cohort of cases with Merkel cell carcinoma (N = 20,829). A decreasing proportion of stage I (P = .0004) and stage II (P = .0065) Merkel cell carcinoma among skin cancers was complemented by an increasing proportion of stage III disease (P < .0001). A predominance of non-Hispanic White (96.4%), male (62.6%) patients with a mean age of 74.5 ± 10.8 years and Medicare coverage (73.5%) was observed. Stage I was the most common presenting stage at diagnosis (29.2%), followed by stages II (12.7%), III (11.0%), and IV (3.8%). Most Merkel cell carcinoma tumors grew outside the head and neck (53.4%) and showed a nodular growth pattern (66.0%) but no extracapsular lymph node (90.5%) or lymphovascular involvement (63.8%). Narrow-margin excision and radiation therapy (RT) were used in 75.2% and 56.3% of tumors, respectively. Wide-margin excision lead to improved overall survival (P < .001) versus narrow-margin excision, particularly in stage III (difference in the median overall survival rate [ΔmOS], 23.7 months; P < .001). RT showed a significant OS benefit (P =.006), most pronounced in stage II (ΔmOS, 37.8 months) followed by stage I (ΔmOS, 16.1 months; P < .001). The survival benefit with primary-site RT (ΔmOS, 24.0 months) was higher than that with primary-site/lymph node RT (ΔmOS, 5.2 months; P < .001). Wide-margin excision independently predicted improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.577; 95% CI, 0.403-0.826; P = .003) versus narrow-margin excision and RT predicted better OS (hazard ratio, 0.608; 95% CI, 0.424-0.873; P = .007) versus no RT on multivariable analysis.

Does the 21-gene recurrence score have clinical utility in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer?

The 21-gene recurrence score assay has been validated as a predictive biomarker in early-stage HR+ and HER2-breast cancer. It is not indicated for use in HER2+ disease based on national guidelines. In this study, we assessed the value of 21-gene recurrence score (RS), or OncotypeDX (ODX), testing in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stages I-II, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who received multi-gene testing with ODX. We then explored the prognostic and predictive value of this biomarker through various forms of survival modeling. ODX testing was performed in n = 5,280 patients. N = 2,678 patients (50.7%) had a RS < 26, while n = 2,602 (49.3%) had a RS ≥26. In Kaplan-Meier survival modeling for patients with recurrence scores <26, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.445) between patients receiving different systemic treatment regimens. However, when recurrence scores were ≥26, there was a statistically-significant difference in overall survival between systemic treatment regimens (p < 0.001). 5-year overall survival was highest (97.4%) for patients receiving triple therapy (anti-HER2 with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy), followed by those receiving dual therapy with endocrine and anti-HER2 (96.7%), and endocrine with chemotherapy (94.9%). Patients receiving endocrine therapy alone exhibited the lowest 5-year overall survival (88.5%). RESULTS: Analysis from this large national cancer registry suggests that multigene testing may have predictive value in treatment selection for patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Prospective trials are warranted to identify subgroups of patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer who can be spared anti-HER2 treatments and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Disparities in Metabolic Conditions and Cancer Characteristics among Hispanic Women with Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

While the associations of common metabolic conditions with ethnicity have been previously described, disparity among Hispanic individuals based on country of origin is understudied. This multi-institutional analysis explored the prevalence of metabolic conditions and their association with cancer subtypes among Mexican and non-Mexican Hispanics. After IRB approval, we conducted a cross-sectional study at two academic medical centers with a significant Hispanic patient population (Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX (TTUHSC-EP) and Cleveland Clinic Florida in Weston, FL (CCF)). A total of n = 1020 self-identified Hispanic patients with breast cancer consecutively diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were selected from the two institutional databases. Comparisons between Mexican and Non-Mexican Hispanics revealed variations in tumor types and metabolic conditions. Mexican Hispanics were found to have a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (27.8% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001), obesity (51.0% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001), and ductal carcinoma type (86.6 vs. 73.4%, p < 0.001). On the other hand, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer was more common in non-Mexicans, while Mexicans had more triple-negative breast cancer, especially in premenopausal women. In addition to highlighting these variations among Hispanic patients with breast cancer, this study supports a more focused approach to addressing obesity and other metabolic conditions prevalent in the Hispanic population with breast cancer. Moreover, Hispanic individuals with breast cancer are diverse and should not be lumped under one category without reference to their country of origin regarding the impact of race and ethnicity.

Geographical Disparities and Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health have been linked to treatment-related disparities in breast cancer. We analyzed data from a large national registry to explore factors related to accepting or declining recommended chemotherapy and whether patients' decisions vary geographically across the United States. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to study treatment decision making in patients with advanced breast cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage III-IV) between 2004 and 2017. We focused the analysis on patients who were recommended chemotherapy by their physicians but who declined this treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of N = 215,284 patients with stage III and IV breast cancers were included. Patients in the New England region were more likely to refuse chemotherapy compared with the rest, with patients in the East South Central regions (AL, KY, MS, and TN) and West South Central (AR, LA, OK, and TX) noted to be least likely to refuse chemotherapy. Factors related to a higher rate of refusal by patients included older age > 70 years; hormone receptor-positive tumors; and having higher comorbidity. Patients identified as Hispanic, those who are privately insured, and patients at academic institutions were less likely to decline chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This analysis identified a significant difference in rates of refusal of recommended chemotherapy by geographical location, insurance status, and treatment facility after adjusting for known social determinants of health. Further understanding of the factors affecting treatment decisions would be important to improve the efficacy of care delivery in patients with cancer and reduce reversible causes of disparity.

Management of HR+/HER2+ lobular breast cancer and trends do not mirror better outcomes.

PURPOSE: Treatment protocols for invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) have largely followed those for invasive ductal breast cancer. This study compares treatment outcomes of endocrine therapy versus combined chemo-endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+) ILC tumors in a large national registry. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) for female patients with stages I-III, HR+/HER2+ ILC who underwent surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend test examined trends of treatment regimen administration: Surgery only (S), chemotherapy (C), endocrine therapy (ET), and combined chemo-endocrine therapy (CET), with or without anti-HER2 therapy. Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare overall survival (OS) across ET and CET cohorts, stratifying for anti-HER2 therapy, before and after propensity score match of cohorts (2013-2016). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were also produced. RESULTS: N=11,421 were included. 58.7% of patients received Anti-Her2 therapy after 2013. CET conferred better OS over ET in the unmatched (adjusted-5-year-OS: 92.5% vs. 81.1%, p<0.001) and PS-matched (90.4% vs. 84.5%, p=0.001) samples. ET caused lower OS in patients who received Anti-Her2 therapy (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.60-4.12, p<0.001) and patients who did not (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21-2.78, p=0.004), as compared to CET on multivariable analysis. KM modeling showed highest OS in the CET cohort who received Anti-Her2 (93.0%), followed by the CET cohort who did not receive Anti-Her2 (90.2%) (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy and Anti-Her2 therapy was shown to be the most effective treatment modality in HR+/HER2+ ILC, contrasting previous data on the inconclusive benefit of chemotherapy in patients with ILC.

Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Updates on Classification and Treatment in 2021.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy affecting women. It is a highly heterogeneous disease broadly defined by the differential expression of cell surface receptors. In the United States, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15 to 20% of all BC. When compared with other subtypes of BC, TNBC tends to present in younger women, and has a higher mortality rate of 40% in advanced stages within the first 5 years after diagnosis. TNBC has historically had limited treatment options when compared to other types of BC. The mainstay of treatment for TNBC remains cytotoxic chemotherapy despite the emergence of new biologic and targeted agents. Defining the specific tumor molecular profile including PDL-1 and androgen receptor testing is expanding treatment options in the clinical setting. Identifying more targetable, novel biomarkers that may better define therapeutic targets or prognostic markers is currently underway. TNBC nomenclature is expected to be updated in favor of other nomenclature which would help direct therapy, and further redefine TNBC's heterogeneity. Given the continuous advances in the field of TNBC, this review assesses the latest developments in basic characterization, subtyping, and treatment of TNBC, including novel drug developments with antibody-drug conjugates, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PARP inhibitors and androgen receptor targeted agents. Future trials are necessary in the face of these innovations to further support the use of new therapies in TNBC and the detection of the appropriate biomarkers.

Factors Associated With the Decision to Decline Chemotherapy in Patients With Early-stage, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer and High-risk Scoring on Genomic Assays.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of refusal of chemotherapy ranges from 3% to 19%, but varies widely by patient profile and treatment setting. Using a large national registry, we explore factors significantly associated with the decision to decline chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) despite high risk scoring on multigene sequencing analysis for OncotypeDX (ODX) or MammaPrint (MP), in which the survival benefit of chemotherapy is clear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HR+/HER2- BC and high risk scoring on ODX (score >26) or MP were selected from the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Only those who refused to get chemotherapy despite their physician's recommendations were included. Univariate frequency and proportion statistics were used to describe the patient cohort. Bivariate Chi-square analysis evaluated the association between refusal of recommended chemotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics. Significant variables (P < .05) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: N = 43,533 patients were included (88.7% ODX, 11.3% MP). A total of n = 4415 (10.1%) patients declined chemotherapy despite recommendation by the patient's primary oncologist. Age >70 (OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.96-4.04, P < .001), black race (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36, P = .01), non-private insurance, lobular carcinoma histology (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35, P < .001), and tumor grade of I significantly predicted chemotherapy decline. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing many of the factors that contribute to under-treatment in minorities is to be key to reducing cancer disparity and improving equity in cancer care and outcome.

Use of Biosimilar Medications in Oncology.

PURPOSE: The increased number and expanded utilization of biosimilars raise important considerations for their safe and appropriate use in oncology practice. This report provides an update on currently approved oncology biosimilars and identifies current knowledge gaps in the management of patients with cancer. METHODS: An Expert Panel was convened to review the medical literature and to provide a practical summary of currently approved biosimilar therapeutics for cancer treatment or supportive care in the United States. RESULTS: A total of 17 cancer or cancer-related biosimilar products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2015. Despite years of clinical experience with oncology biosimilars, variance in their use persists. ASCO supports that biosimilars and reference products are considered equally efficacious for the purpose of inclusion in ASCO clinical practice guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: The use of biosimilars might provide competitive, lower-cost alternatives to biologics used in cancer care, and specific mention in ASCO guidelines and other evidence products is supported where appropriate.

Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer: Analysis from a national cancer registry.

PURPOSE: Locoregional therapy at primary or secondary sites in breast cancer may be associated with improved survival as compared to systemic therapy alone. We explored the sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with the use of radiation versus surgical resection of metastatic sites (metastasectomy) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, followed by the associated overall survival. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database for patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, (2010-2017) and described cohort's characteristics using univariate analyses. We identified 5 subgroups based on malignant site involvement: 1. Bone only, 2. Brain only, 3. Liver only, 4. Lung only, and 5. Metastasis involving >1 site. Kaplan-Meier modeling with log-rank testing and multivariate Cox Regression analysis were used to explore differences in overall survival between those that received radiation at secondary sites and those that underwent metastasectomy. RESULTS: N = 22,749patients were included in this analysis. Radiation (81.2%) was used more commonly than metastasectomy (28.8%). Metastasectomy was associated with better median overall survival across all 5 cohorts (p < .001), with the survival benefit being the most pronounced with lung only (OS: 56.9 months; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = .032), or liver only (OS: 41.6 months; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.1, p < .001) metastasis. CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer may be associated with improved overall survival as compared to radiation of secondary lesions, particularly in those with only liver or lung involvement. Prospective randomized controlled trials investigating surgical resection of metastatic sites in patients with breast cancer are warranted.

Survival benefit of a combined surgical approach in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported survival benefit of surgery in patients with stage IV breast cancer (BC); prospective trials yielded inconclusive results. METHODS: We sampled the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) for de novo stage IV BC patients undergoing both primary site resection and metastasectomy. A multivariate Cox-regression survival model investigated the overall survival (OS) of this surgical approach as compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone, metastasectomy alone, or no surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to demonstrate the utility of surgery when metastasis were confined to 1 site stratifying by tissue type. RESULTS: A total of n = 55,125 patients were included. As compared to lumpectomy/mastectomy alone (43 months), lumpectomy/mastectomy + metastasectomy exhibited the best OS (50 months, p = 0.012), metastasectomy alone showed slightly worse OS (30 months, p < 0.0001), and no surgery had the worst OS (21 months, p < 0.0001). In metastasis confined to 1 site, superior OS with combined lumpectomy/mastectomy and metastasectomy versus lumpectomy/mastectomy alone was observed with liver (72.8 vs. 48.1 months, p < 0.001) or lung (49.2 vs. 36.8 months, p < 0.001) metastasis but not bone (52.2 vs. 49.9 months, p < 0.001) or brain (16.2 vs. 15.5 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with metastatic BC undergoing primary site resection and metastasectomy exhibited optimal OS, particularly when metastasis involved only the liver or lung.